Vexed Bermoothes

Blustery Opinions From Bermuda

Vexed Bermoothes header image 1

Reform

May 15th, 2013 · Bermuda Politics, Reform

The new Government has announced an array of reform initiatives:

  • The SAGE Commission to look at ways of fixing the fact that our Government costs waaaay to much for a village of 60,000 people.
  • The new municipalities reform to fix the PLP’s mauling of the Corporations of Hamilton and St George.

So far so good.  And today, they’ve announced a new adhoc committee to look at implementing some of the OBA’s campaign promises:

  • Extend the days for the advance poll for travellers;
  • Introduce absentee balloting to include travellers and students away in college;
  • Give voters the right of recall over MPs;
  • Introduce fixed-term elections for every five years; and, amongst other things; and
  • Set-up a process to allow citizens to initiate a referendum.

I support these as well (although I never trust a political statement that includes “amongst other things”).

I would add an important reform:  all votes in the House of Assembly and Senate should be by name (no more “the ayes have it”).  This not only makes MPs accountable for their vote (which is in fact a proxy for our votes) and lessens the impact of the party whip but will also pinpoint who is not present for the vote (an ongoing problem).

Comments OffTags:

Bag Tax

April 26th, 2013 · Development

Local charities are lobbying Government to institute a “bag tax” of 25 cents per bag to encourage shoppers to adopt reusable bags and reduce waste.

Sounds nice and green doesn’t it?  I like do-gooders and applaud their passion and community efforts.  But I can’t resist acting as devil’s advocate on this one:

  1. Umm, many people reuse plastic bags.  So now they will have to buy plastic bags.  The bags are still there.
  2. This is a tax. It’s nice to think that you can tax people into living or acting better;  it rarely works out that way.
  3. It will increase the cost of living and reduce convenience for shoppers.  If I am buying an expensive or cumbersome item, I have the right to get a darn bag!  The economy sucks, and a bag tax hits people who are supporting local business!  And, those shoppers will take their anger out on retailers … not MPs.
  4. Our Tynes Bay incinerator depends on having a certain minimum flow of quality combustibles – has anyone considered the impact on Tynes Bay of removing bags from the trash stream?
  5. Remember that Tynes Bay is also an energy co-generation facility.  The power produced by those burning bags replaces burning sulphur-laden oil brought here from Venezuela.  Has anyone considered the cost/environmental tradeoff?
  6. They propose enhancing the “no bag” effort by giving bags to tourists?  Seriously?

I vote no on the bag tax.  I do however support more environmental education and encourage the more effective operation of Bermuda’s recycling efforts.

LOL, I do my thing helping out the KBB cleanups … and by my unscientific analysis of roadside trash, there would be more impact by putting a bottle refund on Elephants.

The Royal Gazette supports the bag tax.  Remember dear editor, today they came for my shopping bag.  Tomorrow they’ll come for my newspaper.

Comments OffTags:

Pension Commission Wakeup

April 23rd, 2013 · Economy

Speaking of pensions, it does not give great confidence that the Bermuda Pension Commission – a quango which has the authority to oversee the different pension plans in Bermuda – has itself not published a public annual report as required by section 64 of the National Pension Scheme Act since 2007 (and this was finally tabled in the House in 2011)!  And lord help you if you want to find out who actually sits on the Pension Commission.

WTF!  This does not distill great confidence.  And why the heck doesn’t Bermuda’s media follow up on stuff like this?

The annual reports are intended to show how the commission is fulfilling its duties detailed in section 56 of Act.

  • To administer the Act and the regulations .
  • To consider and determine applications for the registration of pension plans.
  • To promote and ensure compliance, by pension plans, with the provisions of the Act and the regulations .
  • To monitor the administration, and funding, of pension plans and to enforce the provisions of the Act and the regulations in respect of such administration and funding.
  • To verify the payment of benefits under pension plans.
  • To promote public education on pension plans and their benefits.
  • To advise the Minister of Finance on any matter relating to pensions, including the development of laws relating to pension plans.
  • To provide such information relating to its functions as the Minister of Finance may require.
  • To investigate complaints relating to a pension plan and a pension fund.
  • To perform any other functions provided for in or under the Act.

This is an important area – and involves massive sums of Bermudians’ retirement money.  Back in 2007 they oversaw plans that covered 1,230 employers and 19,449 employees worth over $1.4 billion!  Who knows where that stands now, and we have not seen much legislative or regulatory activity other than the 2010 amendment allowing ill-advised raids on pension assets.

We deserve better transparency, and a better roadmap to ensure that Bermudians are getting the best pension services.  What’s up at the Pension Commission?

Comments OffTags:

Pension Problems

April 18th, 2013 · Economy

The Minister of Finance has broached what will undoubtedly be a prominent and painful subject in the coming months: the reform of Government pensions.  (See my post on this from 201o).

Some background:  Government has defined benefit pension plans for the civil service and for members of Parliament. This means that participants receive a fixed pension that is driven by their final salary rather than how much they actually contributed to the plan.

Most companies and many governments have long ago moved away from these traditional pensions, replacing them with defined contribution pensions, where participants make deposits in an account which builds until they retire, whereupon it starts paying out based on how much is invested in the participant’s account.

Bermuda’s defined benefit pensions are woefully underfunded – this means that the shortfall between what’s in the fund and what is paid out must be “topped up” out of the Government budget each year.  Bermuda’s pension problem has been compounded by the significant growth in the civil service in recent years, and the fact that civil service salaries (which dictate the pension payout) have grown faster than the rate of increase in pension contributions.  Moreover, investment income for the pension funds has not grown as fast as we’d all like.  And as the civil service inevitably shrinks to fit the “new Bermuda” there will be fewer people paying into the plan, supporting a group of retirees who are living longer!

Government just doesn’t have the flexibility to keep propping up the pension as a big chunk of the budget is already going to pay down debt.  This means that a significant – and growing – proportion of our taxes goes towards debt and pensions rather that actual Government services.  And there isn’t that much wiggle room given that more than 50% of the budget is already spent on payroll!

Would I like to have a defined benefit pension?  I sure would – let someone else hold the risk!  But I know it ain’t gonna happen in the private sector.  And I also know it is no longer responsible nor sustainable in the public sector.

I also understand why a change will worry recipients under the current pension – after all it’s their financial security.  It will be a painful transition to settle, but we Bermudians have no choice but to deal with it, no matter whether you are a civil servant or a taxpayer.  The status quo will leave both of us broke.  Left unreformed, sooner rather than later that pension’s gonna run dry.

The defined contribution pension sector in Bermuda will need some tweaks.  The basic meat is good, but very little has been done in this area since the schemes were set up a decade ago. I’d like to see more financial education and investment options, better reporting to pension holders, and more transparency and restraint on the fee “loads” charged by the administrators.

Comments OffTags:

Hamilton Fustercluck

March 13th, 2013 · Development

The PLP’s mauling of the Municipalities Act has led to it’s inevitable conclusion:  a costly, reputation-destroying fustercluck.

The Royal Gazette reports that the Corporation of Hamilton has signed a lease giving control of parts of the Hamilton Waterfront to developers with no public consultation, no greater due diligence by Government, and no publicly-articulated vision of the end result.  They did this despite Government warning them it could not support the project based on information currently available to them.

Pictures on the Internet indicate they are dreaming of 13 story buildings built in the Harbour at the location of the Hamilton docks, extending virtually to Paget.  Looks the “Grand Atlantic on the Harbour” if you catch my drift.

If the facts being reported are correct, this is an incredible failure of governance.  If it is not illegal it is, in fact, a joke.

The decision to develop the Waterfront is of national impact – it cannot take place without full transparency and support of the community.  It cannot be shoved through in this secretive, rushed, half ass manner … which should set off alarm bells for every Bermudian.

The redevelopment of Hamilton cannot replace Hamilton.  Who do they imagine will work or live in these buildings?  We have hundreds of thousands of feet of empty office space in Hamilton as well as significant empty housing across the island.  To make this work you need new national policies regarding development, business, property ownership, residential rights for foreigners, etc.  It can’t be done on a dream or inside connection!  And it can’t be rushed through in secret by a dubiously elected city council!  The current Mayor of Hamilton was elected with only 109 votes – he does not have the right to make national decisions.

At this stage, I see no choice but for Government to either amend the Municipalities Act to restore the vote to Hamilton property owners, or to simply take over the corporations. The PLP’s “reform” effort was really a revenue grab – and it left the corporations vulnerable.  So unfortunately the new OBA Government must add this to the long list of “PLP screwups to fix”.

This “dockside deal” must be halted, and the process started from scratch.

Comments OffTags:

Who Me?

March 5th, 2013 · Bermuda Politics, Economy

Losing the election may have been the best thing that ever happened to the PLP.

You see, they exited Government before the true scale of their mismanagement became known.

The OBA has taken on the grim job of putting Government’s finances right again … and it will take years and a fair amount of pinch for every Bermudian to make our economy competitive again … allowing the PLP to complain bitterly over each budget cut and policy shift as if they had no involvement in the original problems!

Comments OffTags:

Drunk Driving

March 5th, 2013 · Crime

The OBA has said that Government intends to take on Bermuda’s drunk driving culture.  It’s long overdue.

I support the proposal to adopt road side sobriety tests.  I’d also support increased penalties and crazy premium jumps for offenders’ insurance.

However, I think the proposal to cut the allowable blood/alcohol limit in half is ridiculous.  It is rare that “more laws” are the solution to a problem, particularly those that extend the margin of criminality!   Our existing laws are consistent with international norms – what we lack is consistent and aggressive enforcement.  The police have their hands full dealing with the wrecks – they don’t seem to have sufficient resources for the checks that prevent them.

You need to hammer in the public message from every angle:  drunk driving is not acceptable.  And you need to make the risk of getting caught – and the penalty for offending – so heavy that people will think twice.  If you want to drink to excess, make other plans for trans!

Comments OffTags:

Perspective

March 3rd, 2013 · Economy

We all know that Detroit is the basket case of American cities.

But did you know that the Bermuda Government’s projected deficit this year is actually larger than Detroit’s?

Comments OffTags:

Time Warp

March 1st, 2013 · Bermuda Politics

At lunch today I strolled through the small but angry crowd that had gathered at the House of Assembly.  The most striking observation for me was the age of group:  most were older.

It reminded me a lot of the 1980s, when the PLP was equally rejected by the voters, but showed its muscle with angry protests and union confrontations that did a lot of damage to Bermuda.

And defining irony, as I walked away from Craig Cannonier apologizing for using the word “xenophobic”, I stepped around an excited protestor who was exclaiming “I hate those foreigners, I wish they would just leave this place.”

Feel the love.

Comments OffTags:

Recovery

February 26th, 2013 · Economy

The OBA budget statement last week was met with horror and relief.  Horror because Bermuda’s awful financial state is finally being made clear, and relief because we finally have a Government that has both the skills and resolve to deal with the mess.

Admitting that the PLP screwed the pooch is the first step to recovery.

In its Throne Speech, the OBA laid out a concrete list of legislative actions for the year.  Wow, we haven’t seen that in a while!  Rather than the list of half baked fantasies we’ve received in recent years, the Throne Speech contained a lineup of specific laws that Government will address in this legislative session.  So far, so good.

The PLP, on the other hand, is still struggling to find its legs, trying to restoke the fires of resentment and class fear that have always been central to its idealogy.  Fixating on the term limits issue is a strange choice.  International business is the cornerstone of our economy these days.  When you throw out their middle management, they take with them their household budgets, their support teams … and ultimately their business.  The clues are everywhere … from business closures to the hard economic data.  Frankly the policy was all about optics anyway – waivers were being granted with great frequency … but many companies noted the negative tone and simply started to move jobs out.  The OBA has done the right thing by removing this ill-advised and broken policy as a barrier.

Government’s National Economic Report 2013, also released last week, has received insufficient attention and analysis in the media.  It is full of informative data can help people grasp that we are not just dealing with a recession, we are dealing with an economy that is out of alignment.  Our government costs more than $300 million a year to run than we collect in taxes.  That’s startling for a community that is, in effect, a small village.  Out of all the job categories in Bermuda, the only one that added jobs last year was Government!

Want some evidence of the harm of term limits?  Look at the numbers not the emotion.  Non-Bermudian job losses last year were 45% … Bermudians were 55% with a heavy concentration amongst clerical and other support workers.

Want to see the evolving horror of the Bermuda mortgage sector (ie what’s happening to all us Bermudian homeowners)?  Non performing loans are currently running at 10.2%.  That’s up from 8.3% in the first quarter of 2012, and up from 5.4% in the same period in 2011.  That’s a startling acceleration.  Each of those troubled mortgages represents a personal tragedy for a Bermuda family, and highlights this as an area that requires Government attention.

Comments OffTags: