The Web has been around for 20 years now. It’s a pity the Bermuda Government has yet to use it to distribute the bills that have been tabled for debate in the House of Assembly, nevermind to inform the public regarding what happens in our Legislature. Government issued an RFP back in 2008 for a “Parliamentary Recording and Publishing System”. What happened? Time to move forward people!
The media faithfully reported last week that the Premier had tabled a “Good Governance Act” in the House. Terrific! It took a fair amount of scrounging around for me to get a copy. In this day, it should not be that way.
I support the changes in the Good Governance Act 2011. They are needed. But in many respects, this law is a sheep in wolf’s clothing. It is not so much a Good Governance Act – drawing a line in the sand about Bermuda’s commitment to a clean, transparent, and accountable government – than it is a series of amendments fixing problems in other legislation. Like the “Public Accountability Act” of a few weeks ago (which actually deals with supervising audits of EU-listed companies), it carries a grand title perhaps hoping to put some sheen on Government’s lacklustre performance in an election runup.
The Good Governance Act does the following:
- It establishes an Office of Public Management and Procurement. This is a no-brainer. It is mind-boggling that an organisation whose annual budget has doubled in recent years to well over $1 billion dollars does not have such an entity. The lack of a coordinated procurement disciple explains a lot of the problems we have. This Act merely creates the entity; we’ll need to wait to see the underlying regulations and enforcement to see if it actually improves governance. (Sorry, I am skeptical. In recent years, we’ve seen an explosion of new departments that seem to meander without defining and nailing the problems they were intended to address.)
- It also creates an offense for those involved ivolved in procurement who do not disclose interests they may have in the bidders.
- It amends various laws to punish Government employees who alter, erase, destroy, or conceal documents from the Government Auditor, Internal Auditor, or new Procurement Office. It is truly comforting to know that this is a problem.
- It creates basic whistleblower protections for civil servants who report a “criminal breach or breach of any statutory obligation” by their employer or another employee. I support this “band aid” but believe the scope of the whistleblower law should be dramatically expanded. It should cover all organisations, not just Government. It should be expanded to include other areas like gross mismanagement, gross waste of funds, abuse of authority, or a substantial danger to public health or safety. And it should allow disclosure, in some circumstances, to parties outside the list of “all in the family” Government watchdogs.
Again, I support these amendments. They are a good starting point … but they do not go far enough. The Act is a band-aid with a big name.
We do need to clean up details like this in our governance. But we also need:
- To implement PATI, what are we waiting for?
- To further develop the whistleblower protections
- To implement a proper anti-corruption law

